Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Contract

PO Number

Pay Item

Bill Item

Contractor Name

Service

Week End Date

WorkDay

Pay Qty

Unit

Pay Rate

Pay Net Value

Bill Qty

Bill RateBill Net Value

123015011

78932

50

60

Bloggs, Joe










3000456

09/01/2022

03/01/20112022

8

HR

88.25706

8

105.90

847.20

3000456





023000456

09/01/2022

04/01/20112022

8

HR

88.25706

8

105.90

847.20

3000456





033000456

09/01/2022

05/01/20112022

8

HR

88.25

706

8

105.90

847.20






TOTAL:

242118



24

2541.60

123005111

84527

30

25

Smith, John










3000458

09/01/2022

03/01/20112022

10

HR

90.25

902.5

10

112.82

1128.20

3000458





023000458

09/01/2022

04/01/20112022

10

HR

90.25902.5

10

112.821128.20






TOTAL:

20

1805



20

225.64

2256.40

In the example above, the import data is not formatted correctly because the data includes grouping rows with summed totals. The next example shows the same data but this time formatted correctly to remove the grouping and grouped totals:

Contract

PO Number

Pay Item

Bill Item

Contractor Name

Service

Week End Date

WorkDay

Qty

Unit

Rate

Net Value

Bill Qty

Bill Rate

Bill Net Value

123015011

78932

50

60

Bloggs, Joe

3000456

09/01/2022

03/01/20112022

8

HR

88.25

706

8

105.90847.20

123015011

78932

50

60

Bloggs, Joe

300045602

09/01/2022

04/01/20112022

8

HR

88.25706

8

105.90847.20

123015011

78932

50

60

Bloggs, Joe

3000456

0309/01/2022

05/01/20112022

8

HR

88.25706

8

105.90847.20

123015111

84527

30

25

Smith, John

3000458

09/01/2022

03/01/20112022

10

HR

90.25902.5

10

112.821128.20

123015111

84527

30

25

Smith, John

300045802

09/01/2022

04/01/20112022

10

HR

90.25902.5

10

112.821128.20